Blogs
Projects vs operational work - How do companies organise to be 'best' at both?
- Posted by readitontheblog on September 8th, 2011
- readitontheblog's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Read it on the blog is a project and engineering management discussion blog. A kind of 'Carrie Bradshaw' view of the engineering blogging world, only without the shoe fetish!
The aim of this, my second blog, is to open a debate on what is the most appropriate organisational design for companies that are required to deliver high value operational work alongside high value investment programmes. The blog assumes a basic understanding of functional, projectized and matrix organisations. For readers who wish to understand more about these definitions an excellent overview can be found at wikipedia.
I welcome reader engagement and feedback of your views and personal experiences regarding how organisations structure themselves to deliver the different capabilities of ongoing operations and project delivery. If you wish to comment please click the title of this blog and enter your comments in the box at the foot of the page.
Some options that I have encountered include:
1. Create separate functions for operational work and programme/project delivery, alongside typical support functions such as Finance, HR, Legal, IT etc.
2. Create a single function that delivers both operational work and programme/project delivery, alongside typical support functions.
3. Establish separate business divisions for operational work and programme/project delivery, each division containing all the necessary resources required to deliver its objectives.
4. Establish a matrix organisation, containing functions that are tightly defined centres of excellence alongside a programme/project delivery function that is accountable for defining the 'what' (programme scope), 'when' (programme schedule) and 'how much' (financial plan) by jointly managing resources within the the other functions whose leaders are primarily accountable for the 'how well' (quality).
So now for the 'Carrie Bradshaw' bit
Option 1 may be ideal, providing the demand for operational work, is closely matched to the direct labour resource capacity such that the organisation can meet its required levels of service whilst achieving high levels of resource utilisation. In other words there are no stranded resources or 'fire departments'. But how often does this situation apply in reality? Possibly in the case of organisations that manage continuous processes, but not so for utilities whose assets are exposed to the effects of weather and other external factors.
Option 2, in my experience, is adopted to address the issue raised in option 1 such that, by combining operations and investment delivery, an opportunity for utilising operational resources on project work during periods of low operational activity is provided. But what does this mean for project delivery ? What happens to projects when the organisation experiences high levels of operational activity? How can programme/project managers produce accurate programme schedules when they don't know what resources they have at their disposal ? Does programme/project delivery become the poor relation to operational work?
Option 3, is ideal for organisations whose operational activities and investment delivery activities are dissimilar such as water and waste water utilities and where the demand for work is extremely large. Each division being essentially a standalone organisation.
Could option 4 be a solution to the issues experienced by option 2? Establishing a professional programme & project management department within the investment delivery function. A function whose accountability is to deliver the organisation's investment programmes utilising a common programme management methodology based on best practice and the needs of the organisation. Could this be achieved whilst maintaining a close relationship with the other functions in the organisation through joint management of resources? Is it possible to be 'best' at operational work AND project delivery, or does one always succeed at the expense of the other?
I welcome all views, especially those relating to utility industries, please comment.
How to write a good product requirements document.
- Posted by pinterec on August 3rd, 2011
- pinterec's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Written by Chris Pinter
February 1, 2010
The development of new technology starts from a marketing perspective. It is important to know what you are building before you build it. Business Analysts’ are constantly asking the question… What does the market want? Knowing the answer is the key to success. Documenting the facts and key features is the essence of the requirements document. It is best written by business analysts and marketing professionals.
The requirements document is the first document that is used to build a technology. According to Wikipedia.com the Product Requirements document (PRD) is designed to allow people within a company to understand what a product should do and how it should work. [1] This document directs the development team in what the needs are and is used to create the technical specifications.
A good requirements document has the following areas addressed:
1. Purpose and scope
The purpose and scope of the project should be well defined. The best way to do this is to use the S.M.A.R.T. approach to setting goals. The purpose and scope must be Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic and Timely. [2]
2. Identify stakeholders
Identify everyone who has an interest in the project. This list of interested parties will consist of members who want a positive outcome and members who do not. Some examples include the client, customer, executives, lobby groups, strategic partners, government organizations, project managers, and members of the development team.
3. Market assessment
The market assessment section should include as much information on the market as required to outline the project. It should include a brief description of the problem, specifically why this project is necessary and the target audience, who has the problem. It must also include the market size and potential market acceptance so that the development team knows the likely volume to design to. Products that have a potential of 5 million pieces per year require different design criteria than those products that have a potential of one thousand units per year. The competitors and similar products on the market should also be noted so that there is a reference to the technology of the day.
4. Product overview and use cases
The product overview is the vision of how the product solves the market problem. This can be described using a series of use cases. Each example describes how the product will be used in each situation thereby solving the problem in different ways or solving a group of similar problems with a single solution.
5. Product requirements
The product requirements section describes how each aspect, notable condition, feature or function the product must possess. The requirements can include function, usability, environmental, interacting and interfacing requirements. It is important that each requirement be well defined in specific measureable terms. A measure of minimum and maximum should be used wherever possible.
6. Supporting business requirements
Development projects are very seldom developed in isolation. Many other business departments and organizational resources will be used to promote, service and maintain the new technology project. It is important to recognize the need for these departments as there are costs and procedures that will need to be recognized and developed.
7. Known risks and constraints
In order to achieve a competitive advantage in the market place, risks must be overcome that your competitors cannot. It is important to recognize the technical, procedural and business risks and constraints that may affect the project.
8. Workflow constraints
It is not required to outline the schedule, budget, and tasks required to complete the project in the requirements document. However, it is important to recognize any time, environmental, budget or resource constraints that must be considered when planning the project.
9. Evaluation plan and performance metrics
How the project is evaluated for quality and the performance completes the requirements as these measurable aspects of the document will affect the feasibility, budget and schedule of the project.
The requirements document outlines the customer needs and the factors that will affect success. The primary use of this document is to direct the development team in creating a technical brief and project plan. The schedule, budget and deliverables can then be outlined and decisions can be made on the return on investment (ROI) for the project. So… provide as much information as possible.
Mothers Make Natural Project Managers: Part 1
- Posted by johnlang on May 20th, 2011
- johnlang's blog
- Login or register to post comments
I'm a momma's boy. I call my Mom every week just to hear her voice, get her views on important decisions, and ask her for $20 for gas. We don't talk long. We have mutual hang-up pact after five minutes. Click we're done. Those five minutes are important to me.
My Dad was the undisputed head of the household, but Mom quietly ran the whole show behind the scenes. She taught me to tie my shoes, balance a checkbook, play baseball, fold shirts. Who forced me to sit at the table every night and do my homework? Mom. Who once pinned all six of my brothers, sister and me at one time in a wrestling death match? Mom.
Leader's don't complain
Mom has all the answers to the thorny problems in life. For example, I once called her for advice on raising my daughter. In truth, I wasn't looking for advice. I just wanted to complain about how hard it is to raise a kid nowadays. She quickly set me straight, "Tell it to someone who doesn't know better. Do you really think that you and your brothers were angels? Your Dad used to say that raising you kids was ‘like raising a litter of six Dobermans - all rabid."
Why do we feel that complaining somehow makes a situation feel better? It feels like everybody is walking around with the need to vent. Take your situation at this moment, for example. Right now, you've got pressure from the job and from the home front. Something is causing you pain or anxiety. You complain about that issue to anyone who will listen. We're all behaving like nobody's seen the troubles we've seen.
Call my Mom and she'll set you straight. The conversation will likely end with "Stop complaining and do something about it or toughen up you big baby." She's earned the right to dispense this tough love counsel because I never heard her say that her problems were unique. I never heard her grumble about how hard it was to raise six rowdy kids. When I was expelled from High School, she responded: "You're going to work with your dad [a mechanic] on boat engines in the Florida heat from 7:00 am to 9:00 pm while you enjoy your time off school." Dad got free labor. I learned the value of staying in school.
Leaders don't complain. They just roll with the punches.
How to build a Project Management Office
- Posted by ericshaw on May 9th, 2011
- ericshaw's blog
- Login or register to post comments
In today’s complex company environment new projects are continuously being developed as organizations seek new ways to lessen expenses, enhance processes, increase productivity, and build their bottom line. Managing these diverse projects along with their individuals, resources, technology, and communication is really a challenging endeavor for which the risk of failure is frequently far too high. An powerful solution, created to establish a a lot more centralized management structure for large groups of projects, will be the Project Management Office (PMO). The PMO gives organizations with an infrastructure of folks, procedures, and tools to obtain powerful project management by leveraging project management standards, allocating resources, establishing consistent performance measures, and reducing duplication of efforts.
There are several benefits to establishing an effective PMO. 1st, the PMO supplies a framework for consistently managing projects through a regular methodology while ensuring the projects are aligned with corporate objectives and techniques. Project managers have clear lines of responsibility whilst coordinating folks, processes, and tools with one yet another and by doing so, steer clear of both gaps and overlaps between projects and decrease or eradicate duplication of effort. Standardization and repeatability afford an organization better communication, reduced project price, improved resource management, a lot more accountability, improved top quality, greater forecasting, and less overhead related to project managers.
Enlist Executive and Management Support
The first step in establishing a PMO is gaining executive and management support. This step relies heavily on organizational change management (OCM) as it demands a potentially considerable shift in organizational culture together with roles and responsibilities. Regardless of the difficulties and resistance to alter, this step is the foundation upon which a profitable PMO ought to be built. As with any shift in organizational structure, policy, or procedure, favor ought to be gained via justification for the modifications in terms of cost benefit and return on investment (ROI).
Decide the Structure and Develop the Team
The next step in constructing a PMO would be to decide the structure and develop the team. There’s no defined template for PMO structure as every single organization brings its own variables to consider. Some manage all aspects of the projects assigned under them like scheduling, budgets, resourcing, human capital, oversight, and communication. Other people might strictly coordinate these functions with most of the support coming from adjacent departments. The keys to determining the right structure and team members for the PMO are understanding one of the most powerful way they can co-exist within the organization and discovering the proper balance between the PMO, organizational culture, roles and responsibilities, and management style. Some issues to think about in establishing the structure and developing the PMO team include: availability of resources; existing project management standards and methodologies; existing roles and responsibilities; the politics of the organization; project size and volume; and present project management troubles.
Develop and Document Standards
When the structure and team members have been determined, it is time to develop and document the PMO standards, practices, and methodologies for project management. These standards will enable for consistency across the organization and its portfolio of projects. They’ll also comprise a huge portion of the training that projects managers and staff will obtain in the next step. Standardization is also an essential part of allowing an organization to compare a variety of projects and allocate resources where and when they’re essential.
Identify Abilities and Train the Staff
Once the development of project management standards and methodologies is complete, the PMO need to identify the proficiency levels and skill sets of it project managers and staff as a way to determine what training is essential. Some of this information will likely be evident as a result of reviewing the statuses of current projects. Significantly of the training content may also be based on the standards, practices, and methodologies that had been defined in step #3. The PMO really should also establish an ongoing training program. In a PMO it really is inevitable that staff members will come and go and organizational standards will alter and evolve. A training program will make certain that all new employees receive training on those standards and existing employees remain conscious of any modifications.
Measure Success and Continuously Improve
Now that the PMO structure is finalized, project management standards are established and communicated, and personnel are trained, the focus of the PMO need to shift to assessing and measuring success. This point in time marks the initiation of progress and performance reporting based on standardized tools, templates, and methodologies. Even so, it also marks the beginning of a continuous method improvement cycle along with a transition from PMO deployment to operational sustainment. As the PMO evolves, project team members should maintain an awareness of the metrics by which their projects are measured along with how method effectiveness is determined. There must be a concerted effort to identify processes which need improvement. When identified, improvement measures need to be developed and implemented.
The establishment of an powerful PMO is beneficial to any organization which manages a portfolio of projects. When planning and developing a PMO it’s imperative that it is accomplished in a manner which compliments the existing structure or the organization. This will enable the company to gain maximum benefit and to do otherwise could be counter-productive. Since every single organization is different, the optimal structure for the PMO need to be developed based on numerous considerations and variables. The capability of a PMO to manage projects by way of consistent and repeatable standards and methodologies brings numerous positive aspects. It supplies the organization with accountability, continuity, simplified oversight, along with the capacity to measure project success a lot more successfully. An efficient PMO can be a catalyst for higher efficiency as it makes it possible for an organization to do far more quality work with fewer resources and much less risk. The result of these positive aspects is an organization that may significantly boost its project success rate.
Original Site: http://www.mypmhome.com/how-to-build-a-project-management-office/
The Second Key to running Successful Improvement Projects: Senior Sponsor Support
- Posted by Dan@7SIM on April 13th, 2011
- Dan@7SIM's blog
- Login or register to post comments
In my previous blog, posted here on the 28th of February, I spoke about the first key to Successful Improvement Projects; “An Uncompromising Focus on the Customer.” At the conclusion of that posting, I promised to follow it up with the second key; Senior Sponsor Support. Read on to find out about the second key…
It is a waste of time to go about improving operations or implementing a new project unless there is a senior sponsor that will advocate, exert influence and resource the project. If the sponsor is not passionate about the change - do not start! I have seen numerous ingenious innovations left to die on the vine. Why? Because the leader was focused on important, urgent and immediate issues while creative people in the organisation had great ideas but no mechanism to bring that idea to market. The senior sponsor plays a critical role when bringing about changes to the business. Sponsor support happens at two very different levels. You need the sponsor’s ‘head’ to provide you support with resources and people. More importantly you need to tap into the sponsors ‘heart’, to find support in the form of an excitement and passion for the improvement. I discuss this further in my newsletter, Silver Bullet 7. Visit Silver Bullet.pdf for more information.
This newsletter includes some practical tips on engaging your sponsor.
As the project rolls out, ensure you maintain communication with the sponsor to give feedback, receive direction and maintain a level of excitement about the success the improvement will bring.
In my next post, I will explore the third key to Successful Improvement Projects: A crystal clear vision.
Dan Jackson
Head Coach 7SIM Business Improvement
www.7sim.com.au
Project Scheduling
- Posted by Raj on April 11th, 2011
- Raj's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Whenever scheduling a project , check for the following
1) Padding of task durations
Team member will play it safe by buffering time required for tasks. This approach usually results in various time wasting practices, e.g., waiting until the last moment to complete a task. As a result, all the safety time can be wasted at the start of the task so that, if problems are encountered, the task over-runs.
2) Multi tasking
When the team has been assembled from various divisions, they don’t expect to stay busy with just this one task – so they plan working on several tasks at once by switching between them. The result is that everything takes a long time to complete and very little completes early.
To ensure effective plan,
Get the project sponsor to announce the go live date.
Get the team to schedule backwards from the go live date w/o built in buffer.As a rule, the team should reduce activity duration estimates significantly compared to the typical approach.
Plan for an overall project buffer and insert this at the end of the project.
Ensure critical resource unavailability by escalation and enough hell raising.
Focus on the core activities and leave standalone activities to the last.
Project Manager-Solving Team Conflicts.
- Posted by Tom parker on April 8th, 2011
Project Manager-Solving Team Conflicts.
When two or more persons work together in a project for a common goal, conflicts may occur. What we mean by conflict - is nothing else but the disagreement that broke out between individuals due to difference in their views, thoughts and opinions. Conflicts are natural. But at any time, it should not disrupt the mutual relationships nor affect the functionality of the entity – be it in personal or professional life.
Dealing with conflicts at work
Professional environment defines a team of members, who are working together in a project for their mutual and organizational goals. Here, the leader i.e. the project manager plays a key role in handling the team to complete.
Conflicts are unavoidable but a solution is essential to give mutual benefits for both employees and organization to complete the project.
Let’s have a look at few tips; essential for a project manager to handle the conflicts within team
1. Analyze the source / reason of the conflict. As a project manager, you should have a complete understanding about the root cause of the problem.
2. Emphasize the need to solve the conflict. Define the solution, what do you have to achieve at the end of the conflict, its causes and consequences
3. Identify the level, when the conflict is constructive and beyond which it becomes destructive for the team
4. Organize indisputable discussion among the team members to explore about the topic and their opinions. This will enable the mutual sharing of information and a clarity of thought within the team
5. Communication during the discussion should be democratic, but the manager should follow autocratic style of communication when needed. A project manager should lead the discussion and not entertain every member to throw their conclusions
6. There should be active participation among the members. Every member should be given chance to speak out, while others should listen carefully
7. During the discussion time, complete focus should be on the topic and no deviations should be entertained by the project manager.
8. Control of emotions and showing of professionalism becomes key points for a project manager, in solving the conflicts
9. Every section of the topic should be analyzed completely, to understand the advantages and / or drawbacks of the solution to be arrived.
10. Note down the key points during discussions and prioritize it for solving the conflict.
11. Arrive on a discussion which is supported by all the members.
A project manager holds the responsibility, in finding a right way to solve the conflict within his team. Instead of staying away or forcing on the solution, a project manager should outline option or solution to resolve the conflict.
With Regards,
Tom Parker
Communication is Key to Successful Project Management
- Posted by ericshaw on March 1st, 2011
- ericshaw's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Original Site: http://www.mypmhome.com/communication-is-key-to-successful-project-management/
Project management is an art, and project management is also a science. This is my understanding of project management.
It is a science, because it includes all aspects management knowledge. When it comes to project management, people naturally think of its eight major elements: scope, time, cost, quality, human resources, risk, procurement, communication. A successful project is closely related to all these factors.
However, in the actual participation of project, we can find the factor which associated with most of the activities is the project stakeholders; project stakeholders generally include the customer or user, the project team, the project company’s managers and other major stakeholders. In the project management, time, cost, quality, human resources, risk, and procurement are related to communication. How to set up a successful project teams? How to play full potential of team in the project? How relationships with customers are maturing? How to do customer satisfaction? All these are communication management, and the project manager must master the skills.
To carry out all elements of communication, to manage all related people, project manager should stand on stakeholders’ perspective, from their needs and interests to achieve their maximum value through the project. If out of these, it is difficult to make project success.
In the development of software, the communication style of requirements management affect the accuracy of the requirement baseline, the same in the project design and development process, the communication result between project members and project manager directly affect the success of the project. The key goal of communication in project is to maintain the progress of the project, identify potential problems, requests for proposals to improve project performance. If the communication is carried out improperly, the project will failed unexpected.
Communication in project management has its inevitable and irreplaceable important role. In the 1995, Standish Group study found that IT project success is related to three main factors: user participation, management support, requirement clear. All of these factors are dependent on having good communication skills.
Early in the project, the project manager in addition to the preparation of a good communication plan, but also to understand how to manage team, and how to meet the needs of customer, standing on the roles of stakeholders, so as to achieve a successful project targets.
Speaking of project management is an art, not only refer to the communication skills with stockholders, most of project managers can blindly memorizing the eight elements of project management, but how to control them flexibility, making these elements more suitable to the actual operation of the project, it requires the project manager having art management techniques in the operation. Management rules are surely died, but people are living. In every field of project management, these communication skills are generic and hold the other project management with the requirements of the relevant elements of the.
How to use the art of project management flexibility in practical work, ensure that the project greatly meet customer’s needs, guide the project towards the goal of success, this is the key thing every project manager should consider and carefully implement.
Original Site: http://www.mypmhome.com/communication-is-key-to-successful-project-management/




Recent comments
37 weeks 4 days ago
42 weeks 6 days ago
48 weeks 3 hours ago
48 weeks 5 days ago
1 year 4 days ago
1 year 1 week ago
1 year 1 week ago
1 year 2 weeks ago
1 year 2 weeks ago
1 year 7 weeks ago